AIJAZ MAHMOOD versus HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION
Section 7 Financial Institutions (Restoration of Financing) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), Section 22 Plaintiff / User has filed a lawsuit seeking recovery of damages from the Financial Institution / Bank Plaintiff by claiming that he has been sued by the Defendant Bank. Letter of credit is available. The delivery of the goods and the delivery of the goods thereafter on the terms of the agreed rate and terms were delayed due to the acts of the plaintiff bank, which, at other prices, led to a rise in prices, high interest and non-commercial and unprofessional practices. , Which caused a great deal of harm to the plaintiff. That, in order to establish the credibility of the allegations of alleged damages and that it certainly applies to the plaintiff and he has to prove that the damages and damages were any move, deficiency or unnecessary Plaintiff failed to establish its claims and evidence in order to comply with its obligations that the defendant bank intentionally failed or the defendant bank failed to establish that the plaintiff had failed to prove it. I was severely deprived that the defendant had suffered a loss due to a bank error. The plaintiff also admitted that the defendant No notice was issued to the defendant for the alleged damages before the company so it failed to discharge its burden of proving that the defendant suffered the alleged loss and, as a result, at any time The defendant did not go to the plaintiff's bank, the appeal was dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
