MST. REHANA HAFEEZ versus MUHAMMAD ALI ALIAS EHSAN
Article 15, 2 (f) and 2 (g) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Request for Dismissal The landlord's argument was that the landlord was required for his personal necessity and the landlord and tenant through the tenant. Relations of 's denied. The property landlord was a co-owner in the tent which the tenant had accepted. He had not raised any specific objection in relation to the landlord and in his written statement the tenant referred to the landlord as the landlord. Accepting and renting the premises was paid by the partner. No one was presented to raise any doubt about the right of the landlord or co-ownership of the tent, nor did anyone claim a special title in the premises, nor did anyone, including the tenant. Had a dispute with the landlord. There is no factual and legal barrier to making false land in relation to the landlord and tenant relationship, issuing a landlord statement to evict the tenant about the need to personally extend the tenant. In the cross-examination through which the objection was made, no evidence or material has been brought on the record against this claim in relation to an unwarranted personal requirement. Not to be subjected to any illegal interference, nor to detect any misleading of the facts, the present findings filed by the following courts cannot be disturbed by the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction. Unless there is a serious unlawful, legal jurisdictional error or fact-based finding. Request dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
