SHAHZAIB MUGHAL versus IST ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE HYDERABAD
The applicant for the Justice Justice of Texas filed an affidavit of three witnesses to order Section H to file a Section 22A & 22B (c) FIR, and one witness stated that the oath The contents of the lawsuit were not read to him, and his signature was obtained forcibly on an affidavit dispute over some marital affairs between the applicant and the accused, the false case of the accused cannot be ruled out. Assuming that either the incident did not occur, or that witnesses were not present at the relevant time, the applicant sought remedial treatment under the HC's constitutional jurisdiction as well as Sections 22A and 22B, CRPC. Was , At the same time; without disclosing the same to the High Court person who sought justice and justice from the High Court, he had to first disclose all relevant facts and ground facts to the High Court. And under the constitutional jurisdiction or in the revision jurisdiction, the High Court had to look at the conduct of a person seeking justice. As the applicant should appear before the High Court with open hands. And without suppressing material facts from the court, irrespective of the fact that such facts were in favor of the said person or did not come in clear hand against the applicant, and it is evident that the petitioner filed under Section 22A Doing so is the sole purpose of the applicant. & 22B, CR PC and Constitutional petition were to influence or affect the cases / cases pending in various FIs against his brothers. Applicants filed under Section 22A & 22B under the Applicant, rightly exclude CR PC
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
