Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus MST. AMEER BEVI

Article 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), AXLI, R31 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Failure to give wisely conclusions as to the decision of the appellate court, under the plaintiffs under the facts of the court Final results were denied. Failure to prove the sale transaction or consideration payment for the sale of the suit to the defendants and claiming to be the owners of the same defendants, nor the plaintiff's brother, who at the time of confirmation of the sale mutation, filed with the Revenue Authorities. Identity of the claimant, not submitted. As a witness, nor the Revenue Officer who confirmed the change, the trial court dismissed the case, but the appellate court allowed the appeal, and the case was ruled out and the order passed by the appellate court. The High Court upheld the jurisdictional jurisdiction. It was from the defendants that the appellate court did not decide the issue of appeal. The court was delayed and the results were given on all these points. Defendants failed to identify any unlawful interference, misreading or non-reading of the judgment passed by the appellate court. criminal advocate from Chakwal lawyer