ABDUR RAUF KHAN versus PUBLIC AT-LARGE
Section 25 minor's parents divorced from their mother after a minor welfare custody appointment and a second marriage contract, the father, who was a truck driver, had to stay away from home because of his profession; If delivered into custody, they will eventually remain at the mercy of their stepmother, who cannot be a substitute for a real mother who has natural affection and affection with her parents, the father of the minor at trial. The application filed by his client was rejected. Based on the testimony of the evidence, the trial court, based on the welfare of minors, concluded that because the father had contracted a second marriage and was not the caregiver of his own minor children as a truck driver. So they could not live at the mercy of anyone. The stepfather claimed that since the parents of the minors also had contracted the second marriage. The boy, who is eight years old, lost the right to be detained; the father's dispute was overturned because the question was not about the minor's mother's age or second marriage, but his origin. The focus was on the welfare of the minor children. If the claimants for the custody of the two minors had contracted the second marriage, then the issue of custody of the minor children had to be decided with great care and caution. And that was something that was in the interest of minors and more importantly the welfare of minors should be given, that of a female child, who was 13 months old, would naturally need the mother's companionship and companionship. The boy was 2/1 years old. Same as 2 years old
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from FR DI Khan lawyer