Find a Lawyer

STATE versus SHARAFAT ALIAS IMRAN

Sections 302, 324 and 337/34 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), the Molecular Version definition of Section 13 evidence was clear, convincing and reliable that there was any reason to exclude the evidence of the four witnesses who were found guilty during the purification. Didn't exist. The testimony reinforced the prosecution's case for accepting the credibility of the witnesses, on the defense lawyer's objection that the evidence was full of contradictions, was not well established, even if the ocular version was significant, About the central story if it was authentic and credible. The litigation will not make much difference than the slightest contradiction, despite the fact that the lengthy investigation failed to obtain the credibility of witnesses, the defense already acknowledged the presence of eyewitnesses on the spot, saying Eyewitnesses are not witnesses The taken version of the defense is considered inappropriate and the location of the deliberations, the presence of the accused party and the eyewitnesses, the death of the accused and the injured man with deadly deadly weapons, the defense lawyer said. Acknowledged that the defense lawyer raised the objection that the eyewitnesses were witnesses on the spot, their evidence was credible. Are not barred, given the fact that the opportunity to be dependent on the testimony. Without sufficient evidence to support independent evidence, recovery and confirmatory evidence were in the form of restoration and medical evidence was on the record, which proved that the accused committed the blood-stained soil murder of all four bodies. Yes, the police seized it from the scene. Submission of prosecution witnesses proved to be complete. It would be unreasonable to suggest that this incident is a matter of prosecution patent advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer