Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus STATE

Sections 302, 324 and 337 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 evidence were appreciated and the prosecution's witnesses were together. The suspects emerged as rivals among members of a family reported that one of the 5 criminals caught from the scene of the incident was fired from the 12 bore guns recovered at the first suspect's notice, while the other accused. Four bullets fired from the pistol were recovered at the site. Due to the installation of the electric pool, and especially the fact that the suspects were upset that they made no attempt to remove the polling, the claim of legality was immediately suspected of the incident. That the events were not presented and could not happen. Reject that the act of the complaining party may have exacerbated the current tension which incited the accused and that he had fired suddenly and the death sentence recorded on the charge of intention and murder against another accused. The prosecution was not guaranteed in these circumstances; when he failed to prove his case against the accused, he was rightfully acquitted. The allegations of the third accused were also suspicious as the recovery of 30 bore pistols was not trustworthy and the accused in the case was similar to the accused in the case. The third accused was acquitted. Was acquitted of the charges under 324 PPC, however, retained its sentence under Section 337 PPC and the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, while the trial sentenced the first accused to death. best law firm from Quetta lawyer