Find a Lawyer

JAFFAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Sections 426 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 341 and 392 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 sentence pending suspension were not included in any of the three prosecution witnesses. The challan, while the second witness was given by the prosecution, and the third witness, whose name was entered in the FIR, was not examined and his evidence was closed by the trial court, allegedly for three offenses against the accused. Weapons recovered. A pistol of 30 bore was sent to a firearm specialist for verification, while the rest of the recovered arms were not sent for verification, no specific role was played by the accused and in this case No evidence was presented. , Was one that needed to be considered further: Requests for suspension of convictions were allowed and the sentences awarded to the accused would be suspended until the final appeal decision. famous high court advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer