Find a Lawyer

TASAWAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Sections 302, 324, 337F (i), 341 and 506/34 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), section 13, the defendant was indicted on the testimony of evidence, reduction of mitigating circumstances that he was charged with 30 bore. Was fired from a pistol. And thus the right hand of the complainant was hurt on the finger of testimony which led to Syed Pistol being caught from an open place where he was caught in the bushes pistol and 30 specialists were arrested against two boredom offenses. Was sent for comment, but reported respect was not brought to the record; in the circumstances, there was no assistance in the prosecution's case, but it cannot be denied that the firearm injury claims, Eyewitnesses were exaggerated by witnesses to reinforce the prosecutor's story. The co-accused was accused of stoning the complainant, but the complainant's person was not hurt, of which two accused were not proven beyond doubt, according to the allegations. In the circumstances the witnesses of the victim, the complainant and the prosecution had a very close relationship with each other, the enmity between the parties was acknowledged, the witness of the prosecutor who could give an accurate account of the events, was not examined and another independent. The witness was not presented, the prosecution's story was based on an unacceptable statement of two irrational witnesses. The ocular version was not reliable, to the extent of the two guilty suspects, the road allegation was not proved. The complainant's person was suspected to have had a leasured wound and the debris found in the fireworks injury. It was not explained by the deceased, witnesses online advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer