Find a Lawyer

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION versus KHALIL AHMAD

Sections 29 and 31 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 disciplinary proceedings, the scope of jurisdiction before the civil court trial court empowered the plaintiff to take disciplinary proceedings and punish her. The case was dismissed. The entire disciplinary proceedings were set aside by the Board of Appeals and Review, before the Lower Appellate Court and the High Court were dismissed, stating that the Board had taken up the matter. Generally, the jurisdiction of the civil courts was to question any order passed under the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education. The Act, 1976 was dismissed, therefore, the provision of the correctness of section 31 of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act 1976, which was filed by the employees, could not be generalized. But had only banned litigation against officials. The Diet and Secondary Education Act, 1976, which worked in good faith with the provision of section 29 of the Punjab Board of Interim, had also not completely abolished the jurisdiction of the civil court to prevent the courts from examining it. Whether this action is within the purview of the law or not, therefore, the law needed to be enacted to investigate whether it should be repealed. Such a basis was attracted to the clause only if the objection to the jurisdiction of the civil court was raised in the written statement and the issue was issued immediately, thus giving the employee the opportunity immigration advocates contact from Matli lawyer