OWAIS AHMED IDRIS versus SYED MUHAMMAD WAQAR UDDIN
A. VIII, R11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 8, 12, 42 of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 suit, specific performance of the contract and declaration denying the charges of rejection of the intra-court appeal Declined. The trial court, however, rejected the application by the trial court. There was a realistic dispute between the parties, which could be resolved only by the recording of the evidence, which had not yet been prosecuted, it should have been shown that it was banned. Was gone Based on the proceedings of the plaintiff in the preliminary stage, some law could neither consider the pleadings raised by the defendant nor examine the merits of the allegations raised by the plaintiff. Every allegation under the Act must be properly acknowledged. OVII, R 11, CPC Plaintiff's provisions could not be dismissed because the plaintiff would ultimately not succeed in establishing the allegations made in the High Court. rt found neither paragraph of the case that was prohibited by any law nor any illegality or instability in the order passed by the trial court, which was presented after the proper definition of facts. An earlier intra-court appeal was dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
