Find a Lawyer

SYED MUJAHID versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT

Article 39 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition The termination of the FIR The petitioner was a consumer of power against whom the authorities filed an FIR for theft of electricity. And was not resorted to. Energy theft was convicted and punishable under the Electricity Act, 1910, and, therefore, an FIR on a charge of "energy theft" may be legally assigned under the law, according to the Investigation Agency. Was the pure domain. Cannot be interrupted unless exceptional circumstances are guaranteed, the same request is denied in the circumstances. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• BILAL INTERNATIONAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman 2014 PTD 465
• OWAIS AHMED IDRIS v. Syed MUHAMMAD WAQAR UDDIN 2014 PLD 465
• ZULIFQUAR AHMED v. MAHMOOD ABBAS 2014 PLD 468
• Syed MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR SHAMSHAD v. MUKHTIARKAR SALEHPAT 2014 MLD 471
• SHAHAB MAZHAR BHALLI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment 2014 PLC(CS) 473
• INAYAT SHAH v. State 2014 PCrLJ 473
• IBRAHIM KHAN v. State 2014 MLD 476
• ARBAB v. State 2014 PLD 476

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

law websites from Noorpur nooranga lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes