SHAHAB MAZHAR BHALLI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT
Arts 199 and 224 (1A) Constitution Petition Civil Service Government Employees Transfer of Caregiver Government Scope of Applicants / Government employee accepts responsibility for their transfer by the caretaker government order Transfer of Government Employee / Applicant The caretaker government (prime minister and cabinet) was required to carry out its duties in order to carry out the affairs of the state in daily affairs and to look into the national interests in any situation. The absence of an elected government did not allow such a government to make decisions, the appointment would affect the working policies of the next government, which could take power after the elections and it was not given the authority to make decisions on matters of affairs. The government, which was bound to vacate the jurisdiction and scope of activity, powers and jurisdiction, was the caretaker government of an elected government, especially considering the fact that it had limited powers and powers when appointed. So there was no national assembly and thus the important aspect of accountability was missing. The controversial notification of transfer of public servant was issued and approved by the caretaker government and the same government was banned and without any legal effect. The request was not allowed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
