Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. RASOOLAN BIBI versus KHIZAR HAYAT


Articles 6 and 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in the case of failing the pre-trial case to dismiss the students from the plea, were also dismissed by the Appellate Court and the High Court on the evidence. Due to the students' failure to prove that they were satisfied, Plaintiff did not disclose the date, time and the witnesses before whom the allegations were made, because of the lack of evidence in the plaintiff. , It was necessary for the applicant to guide the authentic and credible evidence. To prove that the resulting student performance of the evidence was controversial and not worthy that he seized the petition under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution, the court will not re-review the Supreme Court, the present decision is considered anomalous. , The leave application for appeal was dismissed \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Mingora lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.