SHER MUHAMMAD BALOCH versus STATE
Section 302 (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 342 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The trial court sentenced the accused to life imprisonment. The High Court acquitted the accused on non-conviction. That the High Court did not appreciate the general evidence of the prosecution's witnesses. The licensed pistol used in the commission of the crime was recovered from the premises. The police officer did not investigate the cause of his death, identifying the suspect as a victim of a pistol and motorcycle recovery. The delay in the investigation of the ocular witnesses by the Investigation Officer will not result in the defendant's success as such witnesses went to the police station with the complainant, but their statements were not recorded by the investigating officer for separate reasons. gone. That the pieces of evidence were not contested with the accused during the investigation under Section 2 PC2, CRPC, which should have been rectified by the case remand, as it was a trial error. No one should suffer from error or court error. On the other hand, to issue such complainant's pleas and issue arrest warrants for arrest and arrest against the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Mir Ali lawyer