Find a Lawyer

JAMAT-E-ISLAMI THROUGH AMIR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 184 (3) and Part II, Chapter 1 [Arts 8 to 28] of Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, the constitutional application before the Supreme Court is of public importance and the principles of enforcement of the principles of fundamental rights, in the present case. Demanded a declaration against an expected candidate in the upcoming presidential election that under the constitution he was not eligible to participate in the election when he assumed the office of Chief of Army Staff and challenged his candidate prior to the start of the election process. The extent of the presidential elections was certainly of public importance, but the question raised was the enforcement of the fundamental rights acquired by Part II. In Chap. 1 of the Constitution [Arts 8 to 28], the implementation of the expression of fundamental rights advocates failed to meet the expectations of how the expected candidate became a candidate. How is a violation of any fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution and the enforcement of such rights under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, unless one of the fundamental rights granted by Case II In relation to the implementation of the , The first chapter of the Constitution, the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution cannot be ascertained the importance of a matter, without reference to a fundamental right or reference to a fundamental right, to any public right. Will not be attracted by the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution raised in the present petition, viz. Part II of the Constitution deals with the fundamental rights granted by Chapter 1 and most of them were even speculative and final in nature and, in the present stage, fall into the domain of the Election Commission. criminal advocate from Bajaur lawyer