Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MIAN AHSAN EHSAN versus MIAN MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE


O XXXVII, Rule 1 and 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) filed against the judgment of the trial court for the receipt of money and the defense suit for recovery of the amount filed by the defendant. The first appellate judge ruled that the trial was dismissed by the High Court, the applicant filed a leave to appeal against the improper decision of the High Court applicant, the applicants were instructed to Offer security equal to the amount of the suit and at the same time the applicant had partially complied with the order, but required security Failure to do so and it was at a very desolate stage that the applicant applied for an extension of the term; the applicant could not be considered to have been neglected in the second part of the conditional leave order which contains security information. Has been instructed to record. By the High Court and by the Trial Court, was unthinkable

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Guddu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.