Find a Lawyer

KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD versus MUHAMMAD AJMAL

Article 4 (185) Water Board sought leave to appeal against the High Court decision demanding water charges without the actual supply of water, in which the respondents demanded water charges without the actual supply of water. The opinion that the applicant board could not receive a fee or charge on their account according to the opinion that the water was not supplied accordingly the required amount in the notice on the extent of water charges was excluded and It was announced that the defendants were obliged to pay other claims as the aggrieved claimants demanded from the applicant board that the government According to the Gazette notification issued on 3, 1996, water was entitled to recover the charges, irrespective of the fact that the water was supplied directly or indirectly within the bounds of the applicant's board council. Yes, since the Board had brought two leave orders on the record in this regard, since the same questions were raised in the PE as per the Supreme Court's conduct and to avoid a clash of decisions, to examine the higher question. Disqualified against High Court judgment \ r \ n divorce advocates from Harnai lawyer