Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHAZI KHAN versus STATE


Section 526 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the transfer of the criminal case applicant was badly affected by the High Court order refusing to transfer the case. Neither party was pressured to compromise Three witnesses were examined and counsel for the petitioner did not appear before the High Court hearing and because he had deliberately chosen to be absent That the hearing be adjourned. This is a misconception by the lawyer and if he was not careful, he could not claim the adjournment because of no basis for interference and as a matter of hearing and hearing in the case and about the law of public importance. No questions are raised. The appeal was dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Parachinar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.