HASSAN DIN versus SANAULLAH
Section Constitution 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Land Resale The main question that was charged with the fate of the plaintiff was that the respondents of the original owner declared the facts of the resale of the suit land controversial. There was no aspect of the sale agreement in the view of the alleged endorsement law, and the trial court held that the defendant's signature on the alleged verification was identical to that of the respondents' acknowledged signatures, which was not a correct observation. The applicant could not identify any factual or legal weakness. Negligent judgment nor can it be shown that the decision was based on a misrepresentation of evidence or that the result of not reading any of the material available on the record was that the appeal for leave of appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Dinga lawyer