Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ versus STATE

Section 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 103 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Recovery of Drugs Recovery of Drugs, Non-Compliance of Section 103 CCP Statute Recovered Before Trial Failure to manufacture firearms, the court seized 28kg of weight and 12kg of opium from which the accused was traveling to the trial court, convicted under Section 9 of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 Heard and imposed. The sentence of life imprisonment, which was upheld by the accused by the High Court Players, was that the recovered narcotics were not produced before the trial court and during the recovery the provisions of section 103 CCPC. Was not complied with. Opium before the trial court or the High Court, therefore, could not turn over and say that the material recovered was not pro. At the time of trial in court, his argument was in addition to the drug, but the prosecution's witnesses were told by the court. I was not advised to present the remaining case property. The accused had neither objected to the trial court nor prayed that the property of the case be sent to the chemical examiner. Neither his report nor he challenged that this was not a intoxicating substance, so such an objection could not be raised against the request of Section 103 CCPC under the Supreme Court of India under the Articles of Ordinance 1997, drug prosecutor. Evidence of the testimony of witnesses under this clause 25 of the evidence. Straightforward, natural and reliable that was not tampered with in any way by the defense, any unreasonable desire or animosity against the prosecution witnesses / police personnel registration advocate from Mandi Faizabad lawyer