Find a Lawyer

MST. ATTIA JAVED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR

Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Pension Benefits Proof of damage to public property was the wife of a retired retired railway officer who did not know that he was preparing for retirement so the applicant complained that the authorities His family pension was not paid and he was bowed. The evacuation of the Railway Quarter by its officers was that the applicant's husband did not cause any damage to the public property, nor was any reported loss of public property reported on the record. The pension and other privileges related to maintaining an order of the competent authority were merely kept on the verbal statement of loss of public property; an employee, after his retirement, could not lose his pension benefits, the petitioner Railway. Pensioner with monthly pension, after disappearing, after the employee's legal heir Was entitled to benefits from the retirement date pytytu Nayyar had the right to occupy quarter when he is subject to the payment of rent by the railway authorities jobs for advocates from Naseerabad lawyer