BURHANULLAH KAZIM versus UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI
Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan University (XXV of 1972), Article 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for termination of service of the Applicant The Applicant was appointed as Assistant Controller by the Vice-Chancellor, Jamia Karachi. Using the options under 14. In response to an advertisement of ad hoc basis for the Karachi University Act, 1972 till the meeting of the Selection Board, the applicant applied for regular appointment with other persons which was not recommended, his services terminated by an unclean letter. Were filed and filed by the applicant The validity of the constitutional petition ad hoc employee will not get any right to remain in the job and after the selection of his employment regular appointment the applicant was bound to terminate the service. , While it could not be made a regular appointment, and was undoubtedly a decision. Claim appointments on sympathy on the basis that hardly any legal justification has been given and if there was no question, in the proper proceedings, I could not find it strictly in accordance with the law, on this basis no discrimination claim could be made. Is constitutional application dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Bhuawana lawyer