BARKAT ALI versus STATE
Section 13 (e) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 103 Defines Evidence Principals of weapon / Petitioner who was arrested, arrested in a murder case, during investigation, about concealing the weapon of crime. I disclosed and voluntarily lured a pile of wheat to the police party from where it pulled out a pistol with five bullets and handed it over to the complainant / section HA, who had prepared arrest and recovery counseling. But in section 103, the CRPC talked about the proposal to hire this respected advisor. In the area when the police party was going to look for property or some of the accused was going to retrieve the accused, in the present case he had voluntarily led the police party and voluntarily from where he had been hiding. The crime was handed over to a weapon or trial property; the condition of taking it was not required in the East Section 103, CCPC Section 103, the CRPC did not forbid the police officer to act as an adviser. , Not banned, then again, the police officer may be accused of failing to act as a consultant anywhere in the conscience test This is, and no complainant was prepared materials from the other prosecution witnesses in order to show that police officers have no animosity or hostility to execute the petitioner. In this case, the evidence of police officers in failing the weapons of crime can be considered as evidence of any other independent witness, provided that the police officers have done cross-examination examination of any material
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Phagwar lawyer