Find a Lawyer

AQIL MIAN versus STATE

Section 420/468/471/109 Corruption Prevention Act (Part II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 555 Prohibiting an action, applying for co-accused on this basis It was excluded that there was no evidence. The alleged involvement of the accused in the accompanying prosecution's involvement with the other co-accused was evidence that he substantiated the fact that the original documents were visible and that he had been robbed. A civil case cannot be decided on a criminal case. The question of damages to the complainant did not arise, as he had already proceeded to record the settlement in the civil suit in a case, it appears that there was no action in the FIR against the applicants / accused. Not interested because he did not appear before the court despite the trial. After a gap of six years, the applicants were not involved in the commission of the crime in the statements of the material witnesses filed by the trial court and there was a significant delay in the settlement of the case. In the misuse of the law process, the allegations against the accused / applicants were baseless, they were acquitted of the charges leveled, and they are out on bail, the bond of bail has been canceled and the bail out. ????? ask a advocate free from Gari Mori lawyer