Find a Lawyer

CHILTAN TRANSPORT COMPANY THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus ORIX LEASING PAKISTAN LTD. THROUGH MANAGER

Sections 7 and 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Petitioner guaranteed the occupation of the vehicle due to non-payment of installment against the financial facility provided to him by the bank suit to recover the dues. Was. The bank against the applicant in front of the banking court; and during the trial it was said that suitable forum for the applicants has been committed; in the circumstances, the banking court has to approach, this is the first forum which is constitutional. The request was removed.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• BURHANULLAH KAZIM v. UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI 2009 PLC(CS) 837
• RASHEED A. RAZVI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2009 PLC(CS) 841
• NOBLE (PVT.) LTD. through Manager Finance and Administration v. FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman 2009 PTD 841
• FATEH SPORTS WEAR LIMITED v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION through Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade of the Russian Federatio 2009 CLC 843
• Syed IQRAR SHAH v. State 2009 PCrLJ 845
• SHEHRI CBE v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through District Coordination Officer 2009 MLD 846
• MUHAMMAD TAHIR v. State 2009 PCrLJ 850
• SHARMILA FAROOQUI v. State 2009 MLD 850

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocate from Tharparkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes