Find a Lawyer

RASHEED A. RAZVI versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

RR 2 and 5 Sindh Government Information Section ORI (5 GA & CD) 2 3/93, Constitution 4 12 2008 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 4, 9; 14, 175 and 203 Constitution. The petitioner's complaint was that the issuance of Notification No. Section RI (5 GA and CD) 2 3493, which issued on 4 4 2008, was a violation of Articles 4, 9, 14, 175 and 203 of the Constitution. Opposition is also about the separation of powers and the independence of powers by a seven-member bench of the Sindh High Court in the case of Shariat Fardi v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 1989-404), which was upheld by the Supreme Court. The Government of Sindh, exercising its powers under section 26, exercised its powers under section 26, Sindh Judicial Service Rules, under the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973, following the instructions contained in the Sindh Vs Sharaf Fardi (PLD 1994 SC 105) In the terms of the Sindh Judicial Service Rules, 1994 (prior to the issuance of anonymous notification) it was up to the Civil Judges to determine the different terms of service for persons appointed to regulate the recruitment of Sindh Judicial Service in 1994. The entire selection process for the recruitment of Judicial Magistrates is a Provincial Syllabus made under R2 (e) of the Sindh Judicial Service Rules 1994. The cushion had to be performed by the Board, was appointed after appointments. The Provincial Selection Board should be made on the basis of such recommendation by the Provincial Government. However, with the issuance of Notification No. Section ORI (GA GGA and CD) 2/3 ated by the Sindh Government, the Sindh High Court now had only authority to issue the Commission. Sending request was a regular one. The Sindh Judicial Service Rules are newly incorporated in 1994 immigration advocates phone number from Kohlu lawyer