WAPDA THROUGH PROJECT DIRECTOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE TUBE-WELLS versus DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)/LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Sections 4, 18, 23, 50 (2) and 54 Determination of Land Acquisition Compensation Referee Court Appellant / WAPDA concerned Land Acquisition Officer with respect to acquisition of respondents / landlords and amount of land acquired. Approved. The appellant / acquiring authority is not satisfied with the above award, so the reference has been filed in the referee court on the ground that the Land Acquisition Officer, under the provisions of section 50 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Have not followed the calculation and procedure of the review. The acquired land was not capable of filing a direct reference to an award by the Land Acquisition Officer for the acquisition of a private defendant's land, in which case, no reference was eligible, and neither Was able to file an appeal because the reference was made earlier that the referee court itself was not enforceable under the law, then appeals against unwanted judgments would be treated even under the law if it was not treatable. Negative grounds for any judicial or statistical judicial worker to exercise the authority / authority of So I decided, it was bound to collapse the entire building was defective weaving process, the appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
