Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUJTABA versus STATE

Section 616161 An Anti-Terrorism Act (XI XVVII of VI 1977), Section 11F (1) (b) (ii) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 123 Deletion of all 24 of the accused's recorded case Was linked to the crime. After eight days of the alleged incident, no outrageous literature was recovered on the suspect's identity, but was also recovered from a convenient location for university students and administrative staff and the alleged retaliation against the accused was not sustainable according to law. Was. Evidence against the accused is available, it was placed in the challan devil's column 2, it should be thrown in the bud before being charged in this case, and the accusation against it was baseless while the accused In the absence of any evidence to the contrary. His conviction could not result in pending proceedings against the accused and he was acquitted accordingly.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• WAPDA through Project Director Construction of Drainage Tube-wells v. DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)/LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 2009 CLC 166
• MUSSARAT NAZIR v. MALIR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General, Memon Goth,Malir 2009 MLD 167
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2009 YLR 167
• MUMTAZ TRADERS v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2009 CLD 169
• SHADMAN COTTON MILLS LTD. through Director v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Chairman Central Board of Revenue (Revenue Division), Islamabad 2009 PLD 169
• S. MALIK TRADERS v. SAUDI PAK LEASING COMPANY LTD. 2009 CLD 171
• TAIMUR USMAN KHAWAJA v. ALI MUHAMMAD SHAIKH 2009 YLR 171
• AL-AZIZ ROUTE TRANSPORT COMPANY v. ASKARI LEASING LIMITED 2009 CLD 172

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

property advocates from Ambela lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes