Find a Lawyer

ASTI KHAN versus STATE

Non-bailable offense was committed against the accused under Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), section 392/34 guarantee, car color and registration number in which the accused stopped the complainant's vehicle in the FIR. And unless it is presented in evidence, it cannot be assumed that further investigation would be required for the involvement of the accused in this case. The bail plea of the accused persons was rejected and the complainant and his Evidence of incident witnesses not recorded, bail excluded \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• SOHAIL JABBAR MALIK v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2009 PLC(CS) 155
• MATAHIR SHAH v. State 2009 MLD 156
• MEHRAN SUGAR MILLS LIMITED v. MARKET COMMITTEE through Authorized Officer 2009 CLC 159
• AJEEB v. State 2009 MLD 159
• GHULAM QAMBER PANHWAR v. THE STATE through National Accountability Bureau (Sindh), through Director-General 2009 MLD 161
• A.H. INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 YLR 162
• WAPDA through Project Director Construction of Drainage Tube-wells v. DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)/LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 2009 CLC 166
• MUSSARAT NAZIR v. MALIR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General, Memon Goth,Malir 2009 MLD 167

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

famous lower court advocate from Narang Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes