Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHID versus STATE

Section 7 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 9 and 51 bail, the defendant's grant was behind bars for the last 7/8 months, but his case was still in the early stages because No charges were made. It was not yet possible to conclude the suspect's case. The sentence awarded for the alleged crime was seven years and a fine not covered by the prohibited clause of the Controlling Section 51 of the Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 Was. When the accused's bail was released, he was allowed to bail

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• GHULAM QAMBER PANHWAR v. THE STATE through National Accountability Bureau (Sindh), through Director-General 2009 MLD 161
• A.H. INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 YLR 162
• WAPDA through Project Director Construction of Drainage Tube-wells v. DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)/LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 2009 CLC 166
• MUSSARAT NAZIR v. MALIR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General, Memon Goth,Malir 2009 MLD 167
• MUMTAZ TRADERS v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2009 CLD 169
• GHULAM MUJTABA v. State 2009 YLR 169
• SHADMAN COTTON MILLS LTD. through Director v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Chairman Central Board of Revenue (Revenue Division), Islamabad 2009 PLD 169
• S. MALIK TRADERS v. SAUDI PAK LEASING COMPANY LTD. 2009 CLD 171

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

online advocate from Chowk Munda lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes