Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ TRADERS versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Sections 9 and 10 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Suit for Debt Recovery Vacation Grant for Defendant's Defense, Application Under Section 10 of Financial Institutions After Processing (Finance) Ordinance 2001, Approval of Leave In order to defend, which was dismissed on grounds of non-prosecution, the defendant filed an application to set aside the said order and to decide on the merits in the application it was requested that the defendant The lawyer for the said date was engaged in front of the principal seat of the High Court in Karachi. The legal counsel for the defendant had filed his personal affidavit in which he had actually submitted to Karachi that he was allowed to sit the principal of the High Court in the Karachi petition, under section 10 of the Ordinance. Was restored to cover expenses.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• A.H. INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 YLR 162
• WAPDA through Project Director Construction of Drainage Tube-wells v. DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)/LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 2009 CLC 166
• MUSSARAT NAZIR v. MALIR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General, Memon Goth,Malir 2009 MLD 167
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2009 YLR 167
• GHULAM MUJTABA v. State 2009 YLR 169
• SHADMAN COTTON MILLS LTD. through Director v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Chairman Central Board of Revenue (Revenue Division), Islamabad 2009 PLD 169
• S. MALIK TRADERS v. SAUDI PAK LEASING COMPANY LTD. 2009 CLD 171
• TAIMUR USMAN KHAWAJA v. ALI MUHAMMAD SHAIKH 2009 YLR 171

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

online advocate from Dadakhel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes