MUHAMMAD RAUF PATWARI versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DCO, TOBA TEK SINGH
Sections 5 (b) and 9 (d) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application to be initiated by the authorized authority to initiate an inquiry directed to the accused (government employee) to enter a response / defense. No Final Order was Passed In such circumstances, Patwari (petitioner) was alleged that the Khasra Girwadi Compliance Authority (Defendant) deliberately inquired into the Punjab Employees' Talent, Discipline and Accountability Act of 2006 An order was passed, after which a Revenue Officer was appointed as inquiry officer. Has suffered at the hands of the top officials and in this case justice will be aborted when he gets the verdict. Were required to provide. Written response was not declared invalid Without entering your answer, the constitutional request will not be a constitutional request. Only persisting against issuance of notice to initiate inquiry or instruct the applicant to file his reply, only Patwari's reply was summoned and no final order was passed. The present constitutional petition was firmly filed. And was excluded accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
