Section 497 (2) of the Narcotic Material Stances Control Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c) and 51 (2) drug bail possession and trafficking, grant of further inquiries that the accused had been behind bars for the past eight-and-a-half months. The witnesses wanted by the prosecution were not summoned for further retrieval or interrogation, after allegations were made in the case, but no prosecution witness was present, after several delays, the prosecution's two witnesses, who were a police officer. He was present, but his statements could not be filed when the lawyers were witnessing the strike since the date the trial was proceeding on the basis of some excuse, since presenting the challan before the trial court, And the crime of the accused is yet to be determined whether the prosecution was not proceeding. The case was squarely, and its witnesses were not present before the trial court, which they would otherwise have to be bound by law; the trial was likely to use the trial to a reasonable extent ime any useful purpose. Holding behind bars for an indefinite period will not be taken, yet the trial court has yet to determine, after recording the evidence of the parties that the allegedly recovered substance was narcotic substance. In the sense of controlling. Until 1997, the defendant's case was subjected to Section 51 (2) of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, demanding further investigation into the accused, whose bail was granted after his arrest, Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
