Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Suit for Recovery of Bank Loan Application for Maintenance of Ex parte Decree Auction Applicants of Suits Property by the Banking Court admitted that they were valued buyers. The Banking Court rejected the application filed under section 12 (2), CPC filed the summary judgment clause of section 12 (2) against the aggrieved party challenging the order. Withdrew the right and made it part of the Civil Code of Conduct, 1908. Section 12 (2), CPC was applied to proceedings under the Financial Institutions (Finance) Ordinance, 2001; application under section 12 (2), CPC could have remained in the appropriate matters. The applicants had purchased the suit property. Mortgagor was not sued by a mortgaged property registered through a sale deed against his or her tenant or mortgage agent. The court was only issued by the trial court for transfer of the auction buyer to the auction buyer under OXXI, R 96, CPC but the applicants were filed under section 12 (2). After knowing about the sale of the suit land, the applicant had the right to challenge the order and redeem the property. The Banking Court is bound to inquire whether the order has been approved by the applicant and without notice to the applicant. Were the purchasers of worth or the applicants did not provide the fraud details in their application which required detailed inquiry. Imported orders were kept in separate circumstances under the application under section 12 (2).
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014