MANAGER, PRINTING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN PRESS, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD TAHIR
Article 15 (3) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Compensation, the employee's commitment to pay the GP Fund's scope of payment was withheld against which he filed an application under section 15 of the Payment Wages Act, 1936 ( Applicants) were directed to submit the remaining amount of the GP Fund amount before both parties preferred the appeal against the authority's order before the employee of the Labor Court paid compensation under section 15 of the Wages Act, 1936 Had appealed for approval, both appeals were denied that compensation was not mandatory and was arbitrary, from which the authority sought Refusing to express inconvenience, the employee / respondents preferred to review it before the Labor Appellate Tribunal, which was accepted and the Rs 75,000 compensation settlement argued that the orders passed by the authority were also because of labor. The court was in accordance with the law regarding compensation and they rightly refused. Taking discretion in favor of the employees' justification When the authority and the Labor Court came to the conclusion that the payment was deliberate, they made the compensation. Why not use your discretion to pay, and if they are not, at least there are reasons. Provided that when the authority has come to the conclusion that the employer is liable under section 15 (3), in addition to ordering payment of the deducted amount, the authority is required to pay compensation, which the authority deems appropriate. But not more than 10 times the amount of the proviso deducted for section 15 (3) of the Act created the exemption of the compensation rule highlighting the circumstances where the payment was made
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
