Find a Lawyer

SHARMILA FAROOQUI versus STATE

In the case of sections 3 and 5 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), the complaint of the accused in the case of sections 200 and 439 of the complaint, Luxi Standi, the proposed accused did not have any locus standi in any criminal complaint, unless the trial court had Do not observe unless the person complaining against has had any complaint. The right to participate, unless the court is aware of the matter, is issued by the trial court in the case of trial to the accused beyond the limit, to the trial court, Section 5 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 Should have adopted the procedure set out under The proposed accused relied on documents that were unregistered, in which circumstances the inquiry report submitted by the police had to be processed and the unnecessary order was set aside and directed to proceed with the matter. The case was referred to the trial court as the procedure adopted. Illegal settlement was considered in section 5 of the Act 2005 and the trial according to the law Riaz Ahmed Bin Additional Sessions Judge Goa Dare and another 1995 PCRL J14; Mushtaq Ahmed vs. Mohammad Saleem and 2 others 1995 PC RLJ 1900; Azmat Bibi and another Vs Asif Riaz and 3 others PLD 2002 SC 687; Lieutenant Colonel (Retd) Tariq Latif vs Jamella Sultana and another 2006 PCRL J 476; Jasomal and others made the state and one. And PLD 1962 (WP) CAR 326; Syed Muhammad Ahmed v. State 1972 SCMR 85; Sajjad Hussain v. State PLD 1997 do 165; Mst Nasreen BBB Sub Registrar / M. IC Model Town, Lahore 2000 YLR 47; Haji Mohammad Ashiq v. State & e famous supreme court advocate from Hangu lawyer