Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (b) (c) Guarantees, Further Investigation Grant Although there was an alleged recovery of 1 kg and 90 grams of hashish, it was not mentioned in the packets. / What was the status of the parcels or pieces when they were recovered, nor was it stated in the F1R that any piece was taken from the prosecutor's Chemical Examiner version for sending the entire property sealed? He was identified as Charis, very skeptical of the circumstances. The state prosecutor also noted that there were serious defects in the prosecution's part and he was unable to state. In the section on how to separate the chemical substance was sent to the Chemical Examiner fyktul position. The FIRA of the disappearance in the examination was registered by Section I and not as required by Section IIP Act, the accused was on the border line of Sections 9 (b) and 9 (c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997. Kilograms and 90 grams of bee were recovered in view of the fact that no attempt was made to determine whether the recovered substance was char, or whether the suspect was subject to further investigation, so he was admitted on bail. ? us immigration advocates from Hala lawyer