Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAMSHAD KANWAL versus CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN

Article 199 Constitutional Application Academic institution Despite three possibilities Student's failure to pass the MA Part 1 Examination The student's contention was that he had allowed the MA Part II exam and he had refused to accept the facts. All articles were passed through a false statement. Attending the MA Part II Examination, although she was not eligible to appear in the same petitioner, she did not come to the court with open arms and was not entitled to arbitrary relief. No one has the benefit of her wrong or fraud. Could have been given. Stability built on any weak foundation was not sustainable The Petitioner could not be allowed another opportunity nor could his MA Part II Result Card be issued to the High Court as no directive could be issued to the students. Means committing an illegal action through a constitutional petition. Dismiss in circumstances \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• SYNGENTA PAKISTAN LTD. v. MUHAMMAD FIAZ 2014 PLC 275
• ATTA MUHAMMAD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary States and Frontier Regions Division, Islamabad 2014 PLC(CS) 284
• RWAIDAH BIBI v. State 2014 MLD 284
• EJAZ RASOOL v. MEMBER NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION 2014 PLC 288
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN BHATTI v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Registrar of Trade Unions 2014 PLC 297
• SULEMAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 299
• ISRAR HUSSAIN v. D.C.O. 2014 PLC(CS) 300
• JAMSHAID ALI KHAN v. GHULAM SAYED 2014 YLR 301

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocates email from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes