Find a Lawyer

JAMSHAID ALI KHAN versus GHULAM SAYED

The Muslim Family Muslim Laws Ordinance of the Family (Ordinance 6161) of VIII, Section 4 was challenged by the claimants in advance in the interests of the parties certified in advance of the change in 1986. which was challenged by the claimants. He claimed to be the legal heir to his first step-son. The request that the plaintiff claim to be entitled to inherit the property left by the deceased plaintiff by the courts in accordance with the Federal Shariah Court's decision pursuant to PLD 2000 FSC1, Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 Section 4 was challenged before the Shariat Appeal Bench by declaring it non-Islamic. The Supreme Court, therefore, can not approve unclean decisions / orders No federal court can make the Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court to remove invalid judgments / orders. Disappointing revision request in situations \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• Mst. SHAMSHAD KANWAL v. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2014 MLD 293
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN BHATTI v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Registrar of Trade Unions 2014 PLC 297
• SULEMAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 299
• ISRAR HUSSAIN v. D.C.O. 2014 PLC(CS) 300
• State v. MUHAMMAD BOOTA 2014 YLR 306
• MUHAMMAD HAYAT v. ZAFAR IQBAL 2014 CLC 308
• SAMAD RUBBER WORKS (PVT.) LIMITED v. AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT 1936 2014 PLC 308
• MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. MEMBER (JUDL: II), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2014 MLD 313

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

criminal advocate from Sukkur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes