Find a Lawyer

SYNGENTA PAKISTAN LTD. versus MUHAMMAD FIAZ

Sections (33 ()) and (44 ()) (g) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article Constitution 199 Constitution Constitutional Request for Interim Relief Suspension Order Suspension Scope Workman requests a complaint on the request for interim relief by the Labor Court. Challenged his dismissal order before the Labor Court. The unlawful suspended order employer / applicant filed a review petition before the Labor Appellate Tribunal, which was dismissed by the Labor Court, which was also dismissed. The temporary relief granted by the Labor Court will amount to the final relief, so interim relief was not justified. Provisional relief should not be granted full relief if it eventually succeeded in the interlocutory order of relief of nature. Which is not justified in allowing a significant trial without hearing this case. Order to suspend labor court order invalid in Central Petiotto cannot be declared to be passed while exercising law enforcement authority while unknown orders were set aside Constitutional application was allowed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• Agha NADEEM v. ADDITIONAL SECRETARY WELFARE 2014 PLC(CS) 268
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN v. Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN 2014 CLD 272
• NOOR KHATOON v. KHALIL AHMAD 2014 PCrLJ 272
• MUHAMMAD NASRULLAH v. FAUZIA BIBI 2014 CLC 272
• ATTA MUHAMMAD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary States and Frontier Regions Division, Islamabad 2014 PLC(CS) 284
• RWAIDAH BIBI v. State 2014 MLD 284
• EJAZ RASOOL v. MEMBER NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION 2014 PLC 288
• Mst. SHAMSHAD KANWAL v. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2014 MLD 293

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

tax advocates from Kundina lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes