PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus GHULAM SHABBIR
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A&38 (3) A bus conductor charged with dismissing a complaint for corruption alleges misappropriation of fare money for a ticket passenger, not a domestic inquiry. Nor did the TT40 respond to the statements of the alleged conductor during their inspection. The passengers made false statements and did not realize the fare, thus the answer, this would mean that the lesser passengers stated in the presence of the accused that they had paid the fare and thus the accused. Standing with the Labor Court again, the TT40 did not take into account the suspects' response and therefore made the mistake that there was no evidence of a lower passenger fare from the ticket, the Labor Court said. The order was set by the appellate tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
