Find a Lawyer

REGIONAL-MANAGER, PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPLIES CORPORATION, MULTAN versus MAHMOODUL HASAN

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) (b), 25 A & 38 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 2 (i) Complaint against applicants for removal The petitioner may object to the labor. Prior to the Labor Court that the applicant was not required to work under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, the 1969 Duty of Petitioner was allegedly of supervisory nature. Employees are not paid wages if they perform supervisory duties. Not more than 800 at this time both conditions are satisfactory. A person cannot be excluded from the definition of workmanship in section 2 (xxviii) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969; 2 (i) was not included in the definition of workmanship. And the Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 was held, which is neither relevant nor enjoyable. inheritance advocates near Rahimyar Khan lawyer