In accordance with Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O IX, R 13, the prior injunction of the suit, the plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the suit property, which was originally a public property, pursuant to a fraudulent transaction. The previous decision was that the plaintiff and the petition for dismissing the ex parte order were dismissed by the lower appellate court, along with the trial, all proceedings were fraudulent, when the original allotment was canceled in favor of the plaintiffs. After 19 years, there was complete silence and then a false document based on the claim that the payment was made. But the payment was of no importance in the eyes of the law. In their case, the defendants demanded the execution of certain duties and duties, therefore, the trial court issued this order through the trial court's earlier order. It was done to pay the right. The plaintiff's trial was not within the jurisdiction of the trial court. And the case was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
