Section 2 (b (b) Qatil Ahmed evidence testimony benefit of doubt The story of the prosecutor as mentioned in the FIR was not appealed to common sense was not alleged that he used a sharp weapon. According to the medical evidence, he suffered two injuries. The accused accused of the sharp weapon had been charged, both witnesses who made dishonest reforms in their statements regarding the material details of the case. The material aspects of the case will bring dishonest improvement he was unable to rely on and his evidence did not. Rana is safe, recovered from her possession six days after the arrest of the accused and submitted to the Franzic Science Laboratory office 10 days after the crime, according to a report by the Franz Science Laboratory. The recovery of the pistol and the weapons of the crime. Taken together at the police station, the possibilities for the pistol being vacated, could not be ruled out that the recovery of the pistol from the suspect's possession and the positive report from the Franzic Science Laboratory could not be relied upon. That the allegedly recovered \ sable iron was stained with blood, on all Billovery's recovery was contradictory; the story the prosecution's witnesses described in this case was very different from what was mentioned in the FIR and it was not safe, according to the prosecution's witnesses. Reliance on the evidence was the motivating part of the prosecution, the evidence could not be found. The case against the accused is beyond doubt, if there is one such case that is relevant to the prosecution's case.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
