Sections 302 (b), 34, 365A and 201 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) provide for evidence of crime, abduction, joint security, kidnapping or forfeiture of property, valuable security, etc. The disappearance of the missing, or the screening offender, allegedly defending the evidence allegedly recovered from the basement of the suspect, but nothing was on record to prove whether the body on the suspect's common mark. Whether or not the story of the investigating officer was recovered, the truth was that Nash's recovery memo was not available on record, which was dropped in the prosecution's version of the dead body. Create, not only that it was certainly not recognizable, but also all the other structures that fall on it will collapse. The ground, especially when the nature of the other aspects of the case, which could be very easily architected, did not harm service card recovery, motorcycle keys and dead shoes, linking the accused to the commission of the crime. Worthy, because the incident was recovered nearly a month after the prosecution's witness, who claimed he had last seen the victim in the company of the accused, appeared before the investigating officer, with delay. The evidence last seen forty days, in these circumstances, was immediately presented to the investigating officer by the complainant, the audio cassette of the accused's calls, informing the ransom investigating officer about the calls on specific dates. Was not done Investigation, data collection and affidavit statement on affidavits in connection with the mobile numbers of the accused persons were strengthened to strengthen the prosecution case.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
