A VII, R 11 (d) Special Relief Act (I of 1877), for declaring section 42 biographies, the jurisdiction over jurisdiction has been rejected, the present case was ineligible court, bound to present the case. Was. He is independently of the facts of the case and concludes whether this case failed to comply with the provisions of the competent and sustained trial court O VII, R 11, CPC, which was mandatory in nature and He did not enforce his mind. Should the clause (d) of OVII, R11 be taken, the CPC Court was required to stay within the Plaintiff's domain under O VII, R 11, CPC, examining the same matter and conclude that This case was not affected by the provisions of O VII; no documents other than R11, CPC were to be taken into account for the purpose of the plaintiff's contents or the plaintiff's internal documents. The court was obliged to reject the defendant before issuing the notice to the defendant, if he was struck down, either of the VII, R 11, CPC trial proceedings by the trial court Relied on to prosecute and began unlawful prosecution. The law does not permit unlawful litigation and the unqualified case must be buried at its inception. The revision was rejected, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
