O VI, R 17 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Clarification of the Amendment of the Statement of Switch O VI, R 17, CPC to any party to the party to amend or alter the petition at any stage Was allowed to do. Subject to the terms of the action, the proposed amendment was necessary for the purpose of determining the actual question of the dispute between the parties; if the amendment of the requests is necessary for the purpose of a genuine dispute resolution between the parties, Should be allowed. Under the condition that the basic role of this case will not be changed. The direct power of the amendment was not confined to the trial court, but the court sitting on the appeal or review may be bound by these conditions and the request for modification of the petition will not be delayed. In each case, it may prove fatal that relief assistance be subject to the fact that the amended amendment does not alter the base. In the present case, the role of the plaintiff in the case, the absence of relief for the occupant, which was aided by actual relief in the case of the increase of relief for the occupant, will have no effect on the basic structure of the case. Nor will the nature of the change be required for the final settlement of the dispute between the parties The proposed amendment was subject to a payment of Rs. 15,000 to the extent of the occupation because the opposing party made the amendment. It was directed to pay the costs after the parties had amended the petitions to decide the appropriate matters to the extent of possession and to decide on the merits of the matter within a specified time.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
