JAHANGIR MEHMOOD CHEEMA versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD
Exit Section 9 Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981), Section 2 Pakistan (Control) Rules 2010, R2 (1) (d) Chairman of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request and Directors of a Company (Request) Lenders) The alleged default deferred recovery suit is allegedly to be named during the defaulter's name in the Exit Control List (ECL) Legal status The right to travel abroad is a fact A person was sued by a commercial bank. There was still a decision to be made about anyone, no such person to be named on the executive control list or to deprive him of his basic right to travel abroad or to restrict his right to free movement. There was no scope, until after the announcement no one could be called a defaulter. In the courts of competent jurisdiction established under the Banking Rules, the default decision in matters relating to commercial loans was the sole authority pending the recovery suit filed by the bank, and no decision could be taken. The banking court made the applicant as a disclaimer regarding the status of the applicant, which is not owned by the commercial bank, the State Bank of Pakistan, or the federal government does not have the power to declare a person to be the default for this matter. Entrusted On any action by the competent commercial bank or the State Bank of Pakistan, to determine whether the bank account is determined by a consumer and then its name in the Exit Control List It is recommended to keep this range space
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
