Article 12 (2) Specific Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Application for Specific Performance of the Constitution Suit Contract Fraudulent and Misrepresentation Charges Consent Order, setting aside the ingredients The statement of settlement was jurisdictional because the trial court did not compile matters. The application for setting aside the consent decision was dismissed simultaneously. The applicant was identified by his lawyer, whose signature along with the thumbprint was also obtained on the margin of the order sheet. The applicant did not state that he did not engage with his lawyer. And his lawyer did not identify it, while in this case no affidavit of the applicant's lawyer was attached while giving the statement of settlement that he did not identify it while recording the statement of settlement. An application was moved against the said lawyer. Details of the fraud and misrepresentation in the application W were judged to be truthful in the judicial proceedings challenging the trial and no material could be guaranteed merely to investigate or investigate the case. Whether I will need further investigation into the facts and circumstances. The court should decide the cases and record the evidence from the parties. If further inquiry is required and if no inquiry is required then the trial court was not obliged to settle the matter in each case and the decision of consent in each case was fraudulent. , Were not prone to misrepresentation or jurisdiction. Was unable to challenge it under section 12 (2),
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
